linux-kernel - [PATCH 11/18] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231013115902.1059735-12-frederic@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:58:55 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@....com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/18] rcu: Use rcu_segcblist_segempty() instead of open coding it

This makes the code more readable.

Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index f71fac422c8f..1693ea22ef1b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_entrain(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
 	smp_mb(); /* Ensure counts are updated before callback is entrained. */
 	rhp->next = NULL;
 	for (i = RCU_NEXT_TAIL; i > RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
-		if (rsclp->tails[i] != rsclp->tails[i - 1])
+		if (!rcu_segcblist_segempty(rsclp, i))
 			break;
 	rcu_segcblist_inc_seglen(rsclp, i);
 	WRITE_ONCE(*rsclp->tails[i], rhp);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_accelerate(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, unsigned long seq)
 	 * as their ->gp_seq[] grace-period completion sequence number.
 	 */
 	for (i = RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL; i > RCU_DONE_TAIL; i--)
-		if (rsclp->tails[i] != rsclp->tails[i - 1] &&
+		if (!rcu_segcblist_segempty(rsclp, i) &&
 		    ULONG_CMP_LT(rsclp->gp_seq[i], seq))
 			break;
 
-- 
2.34.1