linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: use appropiate error code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 13:03:23 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Immad Mir <mirimmad@...look.com>
CC:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: use appropiate error code



Le 01/09/2023 à 20:03, Immad Mir a écrit :
> 
> On 01/09/23 11:10 pm, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>> Le 01/09/2023 à 19:19, mirimmad@...look.com a écrit :
>>> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de mirimmad@...look.com. 
>>> Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à 
>>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> From: Immad Mir <mirimmad17@...il.com>
>>>
>>> -1 is not a valid error code. This patch replaces it with -EPERM.
>> Can you explain how it will work ?
>> In scom_debug_init() rc is built by oring the value returned by
>> scom_debug_init_one().
>> What will be the result when oring some valid values with -EPERM ?
>> It was working well with -1 because when you or -1 with anything you get
>> -1 as result. But with your change I don't think it will work.
> 
> 
> if EPERM is not always necessarily equal to 1, we can put a check in 
> scom_debug_init before returning rc. If it is less than 1 (because AFAIK 
> or-ring with negative number results back into the same negative number) 
> we set rc equal to -1.
> 

The point is that EPERM is 1 by coincidence, the intention here is not 
to return -EPERM but really -1, so by changing this you just make the 
code harded to understand and maintain.

Christophe