[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKkO1EqQfnYdhuno-KPPtL311m_sSGRz0CGW_CeOdTayA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:24:27 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use device_get_match_data()
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:17 AM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 4:26 AM Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:14 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> > > > > get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> > > > > include the correct headers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 22 +++-------------------
> > > >
> > > > I'd keep the error message, but otherwise for axp20x,
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> > > >
> > > > > drivers/mfd/hi6421-pmic-core.c | 9 +++------
> > > > > drivers/mfd/mxs-lradc.c | 9 ++-------
> > > > > drivers/mfd/qcom-spmi-pmic.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > > drivers/mfd/qcom_rpm.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > > drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 11 ++---------
> > > > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c | 9 +++------
> > > > > drivers/mfd/twl6030-irq.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > > > 8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > FYI, this patch is not in my inbox.
> >
> > There seems to be some issue with kernel.org delivering my mails. You
> > are not the only one. I thought it was just ones with large numbers of
> > recipients, but seems to be something else. Konstantin has been
> > looking into it. Do you see any pattern of mails you do receive from
> > me? Sent via google vs. kernel.org?
>
> How would I know which emails I haven't received from you? :)
Compare what you have to this:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Arobh+tc%3Alee%40kernel.org
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists