linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231013140921.GA3773179-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 09:09:21 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, jonathan@...ek.ca, quic_tdas@...cinc.com,
        vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add
 qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera
> subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop.

You don't need 2 'media' in the subject.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> This patch depends-on:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231004161853.86382-2-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org/T

Who is supposed to apply the above and this patch? Normally, this would 
go thru the media tree, but you didn't send it to them or the media 
list. You did Cc the clock maintainers which seems weird on its own, but 
I suppose based on the bot error that's because the above patch is a 
clock patch. But why would the clock maintainers care about this one. I 
can only guess your intent is for all of this to be merged thru the QCom 
tree. We shouldn't have to sort thru these series and guess though. You 
should state that unless you really don't know, but I'd expect you've 
been around long enough to know.

Rob