linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: split slew rate set to separate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231013145935.220945-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:59:34 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: split slew rate set to separate function

Setting slew rate for each pin will grow with upcoming Qualcomm SoCs,
so split the code responsible for this into separate function for easier
readability and maintenance.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

---

Changes in v2:
1. None
---
 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
index 9651aed048cf..4fb808545f7f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.c
@@ -186,6 +186,35 @@ static int lpi_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int lpi_config_set_slew_rate(struct lpi_pinctrl *pctrl,
+				    const struct lpi_pingroup *g,
+				    unsigned int group, unsigned int slew)
+{
+	unsigned long sval;
+	int slew_offset;
+
+	if (slew > LPI_SLEW_RATE_MAX) {
+		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "invalid slew rate %u for pin: %d\n",
+			slew, group);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	slew_offset = g->slew_offset;
+	if (slew_offset == LPI_NO_SLEW)
+		return 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pctrl->lock);
+
+	sval = ioread32(pctrl->slew_base + LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG);
+	sval &= ~(LPI_SLEW_RATE_MASK << slew_offset);
+	sval |= slew << slew_offset;
+	iowrite32(sval, pctrl->slew_base + LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&pctrl->lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int lpi_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int group,
 			  unsigned long *configs, unsigned int nconfs)
 {
@@ -193,8 +222,7 @@ static int lpi_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int group,
 	unsigned int param, arg, pullup = LPI_GPIO_BIAS_DISABLE, strength = 2;
 	bool value, output_enabled = false;
 	const struct lpi_pingroup *g;
-	unsigned long sval;
-	int i, slew_offset;
+	int i, ret;
 	u32 val;
 
 	g = &pctrl->data->groups[group];
@@ -226,24 +254,9 @@ static int lpi_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int group,
 			strength = arg;
 			break;
 		case PIN_CONFIG_SLEW_RATE:
-			if (arg > LPI_SLEW_RATE_MAX) {
-				dev_err(pctldev->dev, "invalid slew rate %u for pin: %d\n",
-					arg, group);
-				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-
-			slew_offset = g->slew_offset;
-			if (slew_offset == LPI_NO_SLEW)
-				break;
-
-			mutex_lock(&pctrl->lock);
-
-			sval = ioread32(pctrl->slew_base + LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG);
-			sval &= ~(LPI_SLEW_RATE_MASK << slew_offset);
-			sval |= arg << slew_offset;
-			iowrite32(sval, pctrl->slew_base + LPI_SLEW_RATE_CTL_REG);
-
-			mutex_unlock(&pctrl->lock);
+			ret = lpi_config_set_slew_rate(pctrl, g, group, arg);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
 			break;
 		default:
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.34.1