lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231013150729.750609-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:06:38 -0400
From:   Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8192-asurada: Remove CrosEC base detection node

The commit adding the ChromeOS EC to the Asurada Devicetree mistakenly
added a base detection node. While tablet mode detection is supported by
CrosEC and used by Hayato, it is done through the cros-ec-keyb driver.
The base detection node, which is handled by the hid-google-hammer
driver, also provides tablet mode detection but by checking base
attachment status on the CrosEC, which is not supported for Asurada.

Hence, remove the unused CrosEC base detection node for Asurada.

Fixes: eb188a2aaa82 ("arm64: dts: mediatek: asurada: Add ChromeOS EC")
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>

---
Chen-Yu,
if you could test this on Hayato just to be extra sure tablet mode
detection still works fine, that'd be appreciated as I don't have access
to one. That said, I've tested on Tomato which should behave exactly the
same so I'm confident this node was entirely unused.

Thanks,
Nícolas

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
index f2281250ac35..02ce05bc151a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192-asurada.dtsi
@@ -1336,10 +1336,6 @@ cros_ec: ec@0 {
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;
 
-		base_detection: cbas {
-			compatible = "google,cros-cbas";
-		};
-
 		cros_ec_pwm: pwm {
 			compatible = "google,cros-ec-pwm";
 			#pwm-cells = <1>;
-- 
2.42.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ