[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa66b946-8d97-db50-bc3b-7f1694de2cda@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:36:06 +0100
From: Kris Chaplin <kris.chaplin@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: thomas.delev@....com, michal.simek@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, git@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: w1: Add YAML DT Schema for AMD w1 master
and MAINTAINERS entry
On 13/10/2023 16:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> AMD product managers are highly skilled in naming things. Sigh.
>
> Go ahead with AXI 1-wire master. Any future - from now to next 100 years
> - product from AMD which will be different but sold under the same name,
> thus creating conflict in compatible naming, should be rejected because
> of that conflict or renamed to something else. If that happen I will
> propose a name like "banana-wire".
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
To be fair on the product managers the IP naming from a hardware
perspective is in the context of the ex-Xilinx development tools, and as
such there is no risk of namespace overlap with the rest of the
business. I'm not against changing the binding name for clarity in the
kernel. Would adding pl within the binding (Programmable Logic) assist?
Ie: amd,pl-axi-1wire-master
Regards
Kris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists