[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTb6T6fiVTQTBKP6t-zQnDtSck1TuBbETBjs4bt=ryh=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 12:05:00 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Dan Clash <daclash@...ux.microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
dan.clash@...rosoft.com, audit@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit,io_uring: io_uring openat triggers audit reference
count underflow
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:00 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 10/13/23 9:56 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > * You didn't mention if you've marked this for stable or if you're
> > going to send this up to Linus now or wait for the merge window. At a
> > minimum this should be marked for stable, and I believe it should also
> > be sent up to Linus prior to the v6.6 release; I'm guessing that is
> > what you're planning to do, but you didn't mention it here.
>
> The patch already has a stable tag and the commit it fixes, can't
> imagine anyone would strip those...
I've had that done in the past with patches, although admittedly not
with VFS related patches and not by Christian. I just wanted to make
sure since it wasn't clear from the (automated?) merge response.
> But yes, as per my email, just
> wanting to make sure this is going to 6.6 and not queued for 6.7.
Agreed.
--
paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists