linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: Add bool type to qlge_idc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231014071423.UgDor1v0@linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:14:23 +0200
From:   Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To:     Gilbert Adikankwu <gilbertadikankwu@...il.com>
Cc:     outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, manishc@...vell.com,
        GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, coiby.xu@...il.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: Add bool type to qlge_idc_wait()

On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:58:13AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 07:11:59AM +0100, Gilbert Adikankwu wrote:
> > Reported by checkpatch:
> > 
> > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> >
> 
> What checkpatch is telling you here is that the "else" is redundant and
> can be removed. Although your patch suppresses the warning, it makes the
> code messier :(

Ah wait, after reading Julia's comment, I realize that the "else" is not
redundant at all. Seems like checkpatch.pl is lying. So ignore what I
said.