[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSpIPippZFtMw2aG@gilbert-PC>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:50:22 +0100
From: Gilbert Adikankwu <gilbertadikankwu@...il.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, manishc@...vell.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, coiby.xu@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: Add bool type to qlge_idc_wait()
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 09:14:23AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:58:13AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 07:11:59AM +0100, Gilbert Adikankwu wrote:
> > > Reported by checkpatch:
> > >
> > > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
> > >
> >
> > What checkpatch is telling you here is that the "else" is redundant and
> > can be removed. Although your patch suppresses the warning, it makes the
> > code messier :(
>
> Ah wait, after reading Julia's comment, I realize that the "else" is not
> redundant at all. Seems like checkpatch.pl is lying. So ignore what I
> said.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists