[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQDhZ2rJE19b0R5Su5O_N7+4VSa9Fzo90bnh4K7o_BsAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 23:38:00 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] modpost: fix ishtp MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE built on big
endian host
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 4:51 PM Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net> wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-08 02:04:45+0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > When MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(ishtp, ) is built on a host with a different
> > endianness from the target architecture, it results in an incorrect
> > MODULE_ALIAS().
> >
> > For example, see a case where drivers/platform/x86/intel/ishtp_eclite.c
> > is built as a module.
>
> Nitpick:
>
> ... [as a module] for x86.
>
> So the statements below can be interpreted correctly.
OK, I fixed up the comment when I applied the patch.
Thanks.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists