[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b72324e4-75d2-4d90-9e6d-342d10bb947b@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:31:35 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files
Hi,
On 10/14/23 05:33, Muhammad Muzammil wrote:
> debug_vm_pgtable.c: Fixed typo
> internal.h: Fixed typo
> memcontrol.c: Fixed typo
> mmap.c: Fixed typo
>
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>
These all look good to me. Thanks.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
One comment below:
> ---
> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 4 ++--
> mm/internal.h | 2 +-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 48e329ea5ba3..e651500e597a 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -1322,8 +1322,8 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
> * true irrespective of the starting protection value for a
> * given page table entry.
> *
> - * Protection based vm_flags combinatins are always linear
> - * and increasing i.e starting from VM_NONE and going upto
> + * Protection based vm_flags combinations are always linear
> + * and increasing i.e starting from VM_NONE and going up to
> * (VM_SHARED | READ | WRITE | EXEC).
> */
> #define VM_FLAGS_START (VM_NONE)
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index b52a526d239d..b61034bd50f5 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ extern bool mlock_future_ok(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long flags,
> * range.
> * "fully mapped" means all the pages of folio is associated with the page
> * table of range while this function just check whether the folio range is
> - * within the range [start, end). Funcation caller nees to do page table
> + * within the range [start, end). Function caller needs to do page table
> * check if it cares about the page table association.
> *
> * Typical usage (like mlock or madvise) is:
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index be2ad117515e..7987a092e530 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ void __mod_memcg_lruvec_state(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum node_stat_item idx,
> memcg = pn->memcg;
>
> /*
> - * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption becase they never
> + * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption because they never
> * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two
I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
Maybe someone else does.
> * counters we check that the update is never performed from an
> * interrupt context while other caller need to have disabled interrupt.
> @@ -8104,7 +8104,7 @@ static struct cftype memsw_files[] = {
> *
> * This doesn't check for specific headroom, and it is not atomic
> * either. But with zswap, the size of the allocation is only known
> - * once compression has occured, and this optimistic pre-check avoids
> + * once compression has occurred, and this optimistic pre-check avoids
> * spending cycles on compression when there is already no room left
> * or zswap is disabled altogether somewhere in the hierarchy.
> */
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index b59f5e26b6fb..27539ffe2048 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> * Does the application expect PROT_READ to imply PROT_EXEC?
> *
> * (the exception is when the underlying filesystem is noexec
> - * mounted, in which case we dont add PROT_EXEC.)
> + * mounted, in which case we don't add PROT_EXEC.)
> */
> if ((prot & PROT_READ) && (current->personality & READ_IMPLIES_EXEC))
> if (!(file && path_noexec(&file->f_path)))
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists