linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7ce37af9-229f-445b-9505-10f5b0c60c89@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:26:32 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@...il.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files



On 10/14/23 08:45, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>  	/*
>>> -	 * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption becase they never
>>> +	 * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption because they never
>>>  	 * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two
>>
>> I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
>> Maybe someone else does.
> 
> s/relay/rely/

Duh. Thanks.

So either:

+	 * The callers from rmap rely on disabled preemption because they never
or
+	 * The caller from rmap relies on disabled preemption because they never

but the entire paragraph still needs some care IMO.

-- 
~Randy