linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: vme_user: Coding style cleanup patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 Oct 2023 07:29:29 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@...il.com>
Cc:     Martyn Welch <martyn@...chs.me.uk>,
        Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: vme_user: Coding style cleanup patches

Hi Soumya,

On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 01:02:42PM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 04:47:12PM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote:
> > This patchset performs trivial code cleanups on the driver 
> > staging/vme_user to improve code readability. All patches address 
> > issues reported by checkpatch.pl, and may be applied in any sequence.
> 
> I have made a mistake here in the cover letter message. These patches need to
> be applied in order. I think I will have to send a v2. Will hold off on
> sending it just in case any other problems are pointed out by someone after 
> review.  

No need to resend for this reason. Patches in patchsets are
anyway always applied in the sequence they are sent.

Andi