[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231016165208.GH33217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:52:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bsegall@...gle.com,
mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, corbet@....net, qyousef@...alina.io,
chris.hyser@...cle.com, patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, pjt@...gle.com,
pavel@....cz, qperret@...gle.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
joshdon@...gle.com, timj@....org, kprateek.nayak@....com,
yu.c.chen@...el.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, efault@....de,
tglx@...utronix.de, wuyun.abel@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/eevdf: Toggle eligibility through sched_feat
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:28:51AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The main point is, our testing is not around any single benchmark that we
> are trying to make happy. We really are looking at what makes the user base
> run better in the real world.
This is a key (har-har) performance indicator for you guys though, I've
seen it mentioned before (with the core-scheduling crud IIRC).
As such it would be good to capture in a stand alone program and share.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists