[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS1os-rIcdVu91Co@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 09:45:39 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 07/11] KVM: x86: Make Hyper-V emulation optional
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com> writes:
> >>
>
> ...
>
> >> >
> >> > "Provides KVM support for emulating Microsoft Hypervisor (Hyper-V).
> >
> > I don't think we should put Hyper-V in parentheses, I haven't seen any documentation
> > that calls it "Microsoft Hypervisor", i.e. Hyper-V is the full and
> > proper name.
>
> Ha :-) From
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hyperv/1696010501-24584-1-git-send-email-nunodasneves@linux.microsoft.com/
>
> """
> This series introduces support for creating and running guest machines
> while running on the Microsoft Hypervisor. [0]
> ...
> [0] "Hyper-V" is more well-known, but it really refers to the whole stack
> including the hypervisor and other components that run in Windows
> kernel and userspace.
> """
LOL indeed. :-)
> I'm fine with keeping the staus quo though :-)
>
> >
> >> > This makes KVM expose a set of paravirtualized interfaces,
> >
> > s/makes/allows, since KVM still requires userspace to opt-in to exposing Hyper-V.
> >
> >> > documented in the HyperV TLFS,
> >
> > s/TLFS/spec? Readers that aren't already familiar with Hyper-V will have no idea
> > what TLFS is until they click the link.
> >
> >> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs,
> >> > which consists of a subset of paravirtualized interfaces that HyperV exposes
> >
> > We can trim this paragraph by stating that KVM only supports a subset of the
> > PV interfaces straightaway.
> >
> >> > to its guests.
> >
> > E.g.
> >
> > Provides KVM support for for emulating Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows KVM to
> > expose a subset of the paravirtualized interfaces defined in Hyper-V's spec:
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs.
To fold in the whole "Microsoft Hypervisor" thing, what if we take the verbiage
verbatim from the TLFS intro?
Provides KVM support for emulating Microsoft Hyper-V. This allows KVM to
expose a subset of the paravirtualized interfaces defined in the Hyper-V
Hypervisor Top-Level Functional Specification (TLFS):
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> >
> >> >
> >> > This improves performance of modern Windows guests.
> >
> > Isn't Hyper-V emulation effectively mandatory these days? IIRC, modern versions
> > of Windows will fail to boot if they detect a hypervisor but the core Hyper-V
> > interfaces aren't supported.
> >
>
> It's rather a rule of thumb: normally, modern Windows and Hyper-V
> versions (Win10/11, WS2019/22) boot and pretend to work but without
> Hyper-V enlightenment it's not uncommon to see a blue screen of death
> because of a watchdog firing. It's hard to say for sure as things keep
> changing under the hood so even different builds can behave differently;
> pretending we're a genuine Hyper-V was proven to be the most robust
> approach.
We should capture something to that effect in the help. I want to avoid bug
reports of Windows not working on KVM because someone turned off CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
because the help implies that it _only_ improves performance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists