[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS147N1JKyUvaHyJ@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:54:52 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 05:15:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
> [also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf arm/for-next kvmarm/next soc/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231013]
> [cannot apply to arm/fixes]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/arm64-mm-Hoist-synchronization-out-of-set_ptes-loop/20231005-231636
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005140730.2191134-1-ryan.roberts%40arm.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
> config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from net/ipv4/route.c:66:
> In file included from include/linux/mm.h:29:
> In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:344:65: warning: parameter 'addr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
> 344 | static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> | ^
> 1 warning generated.
Thanks for the report. I think something like below will do (I'll test
and commit as a separate patch, it's not something that Ryan's patch
introduces):
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 68984ba9ce2a..b19a8aee684c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -341,8 +341,9 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages);
}
-static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
- pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long __always_unused addr,
+ pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
{
page_table_check_ptes_set(mm, ptep, pte, nr);
__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);
@@ -353,7 +354,6 @@ static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
if (--nr == 0)
break;
ptep++;
- addr += PAGE_SIZE;
pte_val(pte) += PAGE_SIZE;
}
}
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkdevmap(pmd_t pmd)
#define pud_pfn(pud) ((__pud_to_phys(pud) & PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
#define pfn_pud(pfn,prot) __pud(__phys_to_pud_val((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))
-static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long __always_unused addr,
pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
{
__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists