lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:35:47 +0200
From:   Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc:     Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: run test suites only after module initialization completes

Commit 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") is causing all test suites to run (when
built as modules) while still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. In that state,
test modules are not fully initialized and lack sysfs kobjects.
This behavior can cause a crash if the test module tries to register
fake devices.

This patch restores the normal execution flow, waiting for the module
initialization to complete before running the test suites.
The issue reported in the commit mentioned above is addressed using
virt_addr_valid() to detect if the module loading has failed
and mod->kunit_suites has not been allocated using kmalloc_array().

Fixes: 2810c1e99867 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
---
 lib/kunit/test.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 421f13981412..1a49569186fc 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -769,12 +769,14 @@ static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod)
 	};
 	const char *action = kunit_action();
 
+	if (!suite_set.start || !virt_addr_valid(suite_set.start))
+		return;
+
 	if (!action)
 		__kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites,
 					 mod->num_kunit_suites);
 
-	if (suite_set.start)
-		kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
+	kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
 }
 
 static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
@@ -784,12 +786,12 @@ static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
 
 	switch (val) {
 	case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
+		kunit_module_init(mod);
 		break;
 	case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
 		kunit_module_exit(mod);
 		break;
 	case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
-		kunit_module_init(mod);
 		break;
 	case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
 		break;
-- 
2.41.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ