Message-ID: <klxzte53bzk774zinhfrdwdwalvv2hlvc2mqiuyecxcneqkdbt@qbkyc4fdlcka>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:29:17 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To:     Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, r-gunasekaran@...com,
        srk@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: Don't enable BAR0 if link is not detected

Hi Siddharth

On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:22:48AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/10/23 00:19, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:36:01AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> >> On 13/10/23 10:33, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> >>> On 12/10/23 22:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> >>>>> On 11/10/23 19:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>>>>                                               msix_prepare_msi_desc
> >>>>> In this function: msix_prepare_msi_desc, the following readl()
> >>>>> causes completion timeout:
> >>>>> 		desc->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
> >>>>> The completion timeout with the readl is only observed when the link
> >>>>> is down (No Endpoint device is actually connected to the PCIe
> >>>>> connector slot).
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you know the address ("addr")?  From pci_msix_desc_addr(), it looks
> >>>> like it should be:
> >>>>
> >>>>   desc->pci.mask_base + desc->msi_index * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE
> >>>>
> >>>> and desc->pci.mask_base should be dev->msix_base, which we got from
> >>>> msix_map_region(), which ioremaps part of the BAR indicated by the
> >>>> MSI-X Table Offset/Table BIR register.
> >>>>
> >>>> I wonder if this readl() is being handled as an MMIO access to a
> >>>> downstream device instead of a Root Port BAR access because it's
> >>>> inside the Root Port's MMIO window.
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you dump out these values just before the readl()?
> >>>>
> >>>>   phys_addr inside msix_map_region()
> >>>>   dev->msix_base
> >>>>   desc->pci.mask_base
> >>>>   desc->msi_index
> >>>>   addr
> >>>
> >>> phys_addr: 0x10102000
> >>> msix_base: 0xffff80000997a000
> >>> mask_base: 0xffff80000997a000
> >>> msi_index: 0
> >>> addr: 0xffff80000997a000
> >>>
> >>> Also, the details of BAR allocation from the logs are:
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: host bridge /bus@...000/pcie@...0000 ranges:
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie:       IO 0x0010020000..0x001002ffff -> 0x0000000000
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie:      MEM 0x0010030000..0x0017ffffff -> 0x0010030000
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU unroll: enabled
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU regions: 8 ob, 8 ib, align 64K, limit 4G
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: Phy link never came up
> >>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> >>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> >>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xffff]
> >>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x10030000-0x17ffffff]
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: [104c:b00c] type 01 class 0x060400
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x05500000-0x055fffff]
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x101fffff]
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10030000-0x1003ffff pref]
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
> >>>
> >>> The value of phys_addr lies within the range allocated to BAR0.
> >>>
> >>>>   call early_dump_pci_device() on the Root Port
> >>>
> >>> I invoked early_dump_pci_device() within the pci_setup_device() function in
> >>> drivers/pci/probe.c and the output is:
> > 
> > It'd be better to dump the config space immediately before the readl()
> > since the PCI core did change some things in the interim.
> 
> I dumped the config space just before the readl() and it is:
> 
> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: config space:
> 00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
> 00000010: 00 00 10 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 f0 00 00 00
> 00000020: f0 ff 00 00 f0 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17 01 02 00
> 00000040: 01 50 c3 5b 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00000050: 05 70 80 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 1f 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
> 00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 10 00 01 00
> 00000090: 00 00 00 00 1f 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00
> 000000a0: 02 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 000000b0: 11 00 00 c1 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> BAR0 was configured with the value: 0x05500000 within ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() at:
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, ks_pcie->app.start);
> and can be verified based on the previous config space dump I had shared within
> the pci_setup_device() function. But, looking at the dump above which is just
> before the readl(), its value seems to have changed to 0x10100000.
> 
> I am listing down the regions of config space which have changed, based on the
> comparison of dumps taken within pci_setup_device() and just before the readl():
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
> Before readl():
> 00000010: 00 00 10 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 f0 00 00 00
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> Before readl():
> 00000020: f0 ff 00 00 f0 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 01 00 00
> Before readl():
> 00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17 01 02 00
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 10 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
> Before readl():
> 00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 1f 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 00 00 01 00
> Before readl():
> 00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 10 00 01 00
> 
> Within pci_setup_device():
> 000000b0: 11 00 00 01 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
> Before readl():
> 000000b0: 11 00 00 c1 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> > 
> >>> pci 0000:00:00.0: config space:
> >>> 00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
> > 
> >   PCI_COMMAND = 0x0107
> >     PCI_COMMAND_IO | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER | PCI_COMMAND_SERR
> > 
> >>> 00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
> >>> 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 
> >   PCI_IO_BASE            =       0x00 low 4 bits indicate 16-bit addressing
> >   PCI_IO_LIMIT           =       0x00
> >   PCI_MEMORY_BASE        =     0x0000
> >   PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT       =     0x0000
> >   PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE   =     0x0000 low 4 bits indicate 32-bit pref
> >   PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT  =     0x0000
> >   PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32  = 0x00000000
> >   PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 = 0x00000000
> > 
> > We can't tell from this whether the prefetchable window is implemented
> > (but I'm sure keystone *does* implement it).  If PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE
> > and PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT are read-only zeros, it is not implemented.
> > If they are writable, it is enabled at the same range as the
> > non-prefetchable window.
> 
> Yes, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE and PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT are writable.
> 
> > 
> > Similarly for the I/O window; we can't tell whether the base/limit are
> > read-only zero or writable.
> 
> PCI_IO_BASE and PCI_IO_LIMIT are also writable.
> 
> > 
> > So we have these windows that look like they're probably enabled:
> > 
> >   io window   at [io  0x0000-0x0fff]
> >   mem window  at [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> >   pref window at [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
> > 
> > No idea whether it makes a difference, but these windows seem
> > misconfigured.  The default should probably be to make them all
> > disabled (as in f73eedc90bf7 ("PCI: vmd: Disable bridge window for
> > domain reset")):
> > 
> >   PCI_IO_BASE            = 0xf0
> >   PCI_IO_LIMIT           = 0x00
> >   PCI_MEMORY_BASE        = 0xfff0
> >   PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT       = 0x0000
> >   PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE   = 0xfff0
> >   PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT  = 0x0000
> >   PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32  = 0xffffffff
> >   PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 = 0x00000000
> > 
> > The PCI core should reconfigure and enable them as needed by
> > downstream devices.
> > 
> >> I also noticed that the value of desc->pci.msix_ctrl obtained from
> >> the readl is always 0xffffffff irrespective of whether or not an
> >> endpoint device is connected. This isn't expected right? The only
> >> difference between the cases where endpoint device is connected and
> >> isn't connected is the completion timeout.
> > 
> > Right, I wouldn't expect that.  PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL has a bunch
> > of reserved bits that should be zero.
> > 
> > I assume MSI-X actually does work for downstream endpoints?  I
> > wouldn't think anybody would have bothered with
> > ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() unless MSI-X works.
> 
> Yes, I think it is supposed to work, but it doesn't seem to be working right now
> considering that even with Endpoint device connected, the readl() returns all Fs.

Could you please have look at what DW PCIe IP-core version is utilized
in the Keystone PCIe host controller? If it's of v5.x then here is
what HW databook says about the BARs initialization: "If you do use a
BAR, then you should program it to capture TLPs that are targeted to
your local non-application memory space residing on TRGT1, and not for
the application on TRGT0 (dbi). The BAR range must be outside of the
three Base/Limit regions."

I have no idea whether the BAR being set with an address within the
Base/Limit regions could have caused the lags you see, but I would
have at least checked that.

-Serge(y)

> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Siddharth.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists