[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi0mF0sFGweuhGaLyKCT-itO_RgbEcmxkgkwYxEzbHyzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:14:50 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] x86/percpu: Use C for arch_raw_cpu_ptr()
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 16:02, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> so I think this is the right thing to do. I checked that the 32-bit
> code builds and looks sane too.
Just to clarify: the 64-bit side I actually booted and am running.
The 32-bit side is pretty much identical, but I only checked that that
'process_32.c' file still builds. I didn't do any other testing.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists