[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZSz7---IW_7Oj2Zr@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:01:47 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp-x13s: Use the correct DP PHY
compatible
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:51:33AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 19:03, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > The DP PHY needs different settings when an eDP display is used.
> > Make sure these apply on the X13s.
>
> Could you please clarify, is it the same PHY type, just being
> repurposed for eDP or is it a different PHY type?
Same PHY, just different settings AFAIK.
> If the former is the case (and the same PHY can be used for both DP
> and eDP), it should carry the same compatible string and use software
> mechanisms (e.g. phy_set_mode_ext()) to be programmed for the correct
> operation mode.
Possibly, but that's not how the current binding and implementation
works:
6993c079cd58 ("dt-bindings: phy: qcom-edp: Add SC8280XP PHY compatibles")
2300d1cb24b3 ("phy: qcom: edp: Introduce support for DisplayPort")
3b7267dec445 ("phy: qcom: edp: Add SC8280XP eDP and DP PHYs")
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220810040745.3582985-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
And you'd still need to infer the mode from DT somehow.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists