linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in udf_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231016094155.lacz5rps5ztdcudd@quack3>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:41:55 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@...il.com>
Cc:     jack@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+abb7222a58e4ebc930ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in udf_process_sequence

On Sat 14-10-23 00:09:29, Osama Muhammad wrote:
> Syzkaller reported the following issue:
> 
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in fs/udf/super.c:1365:9
> index 4 is out of range for type '__le32[4]' (aka 'unsigned int[4]')
> CPU: 0 PID: 6060 Comm: syz-executor319 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc6-syzkaller-00253-g9e6c269de404 #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>  dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
>  ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:217 [inline]
>  __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x11c/0x150 lib/ubsan.c:348
>  udf_load_sparable_map fs/udf/super.c:1365 [inline]
>  udf_load_logicalvol fs/udf/super.c:1457 [inline]
>  udf_process_sequence+0x300d/0x4e70 fs/udf/super.c:1773
>  udf_load_sequence fs/udf/super.c:1820 [inline]
>  udf_check_anchor_block+0x2a6/0x550 fs/udf/super.c:1855
>  udf_scan_anchors fs/udf/super.c:1888 [inline]
>  udf_load_vrs+0x5ca/0x1100 fs/udf/super.c:1969
>  udf_fill_super+0x95d/0x23a0 fs/udf/super.c:2147
>  mount_bdev+0x276/0x3b0 fs/super.c:1391
>  legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
>  vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
>  do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0 fs/namespace.c:3335
>  do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
>  __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
>  __se_sys_mount+0x2d9/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3861
>  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>  do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> RIP: 0033:0x7f363cae1c8a
> Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb a6 e8 3e 07 00 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eac67a8 EFLAGS: 00000282 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f363cae1c8a
> RDX: 0000000020000100 RSI: 0000000020000340 RDI: 00007ffe6eac6800
> RBP: 00007ffe6eac6840 R08: 00007ffe6eac6840 R09: 0000000000000c35
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000282 R12: 0000000020000340
> R13: 0000000020000100 R14: 0000000000000c3b R15: 0000000020020500
>  </TASK>
> 
> The issue is caused when the value of i becomes equal or more than 4 which is
> the size of array. In the code the condition checks the value of
> spm->numSparingTables. syzbot was able to make spm->numSparingTables
> value 4 which is cauing this error. The patch adds one more condition
> to check the value of i should be less than 4.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+abb7222a58e4ebc930ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=abb7222a58e4ebc930ad
> Signed-off-by: Osama Muhammad <osmtendev@...il.com>

But as you can see we test:

        if (spm->numSparingTables > 4) {

just before the loop. So this error means that syzbot has been modifying
the filesystem image while is was in use. That is invalid syzbot program as
there is no way how we could fix all such bugs (effectively it is
equivalent to corrupting memory). So I'm not going to apply your patch,
sorry. I already have patches that forbid writing to filesystem image that
is mounted but it will take a while to get them merged...

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/udf/super.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index 928a04d9d9e0..8c8731c3f8d9 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ static int udf_load_sparable_map(struct super_block *sb,
>  		return -EIO;
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < spm->numSparingTables; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < spm->numSparingTables && i < 4; i++) {
>  		loc = le32_to_cpu(spm->locSparingTable[i]);
>  		bh = udf_read_tagged(sb, loc, loc, &ident);
>  		if (!bh)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR