linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ8074

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:36:09 +0200
From:   Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
        agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
        ilia.lin@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: add support for IPQ8074

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 12:31, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 16-10-23, 10:43, Robert Marko wrote:
> > Ok, I understand now, the thing is that the ID-s were added for
> > socinfo initially but recently
> > I finally had somebody with access to the Oak HW so I added them to
> > cpufreq as well.
> >
> > What can I do to help this get resolved?
>
> Rebased over Bjorn's commit (which he already sent in his Arm SoC pull
> request) and applied your patch again.

Thank you for your understanding, I will watch out for possible cases
like these in the future.

Regards,
Robert
>
> --
> viresh