[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98297bfc-ab81-4bb5-acc3-619fdf879276@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 13:40:50 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To: Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] Add StarFive Camera Subsystem driver
Hi Jack,
On 08/10/2023 10:51, Jack Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series is the v10 series that attempts to support the Camera Subsystem
> found on StarFive JH7110 SoC.
>
> This series is based on top of the master branch of media_stage repository,
> which is tested with a v4l2-compliance compiled from the git repo
> (git://linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git).
I get one smatch warning:
drivers/staging/media/starfive/camss/stf-isp.c:122 isp_enum_mbus_code() warn: unsigned 'code->index' is never less than zero.
And I also notice that there is no TODO file: staging drivers should have a
TODO file explaining what needs to be done to get them out of staging.
I'm curious to know that as well :-)
It looks like there is a lot of additional development that can be done, since
most of the ISP parameters appear to be hardcoded.
I also notice something weird in the compliance test output for v4l-subdev0 vs
v4l-subdev1:
> Compliance test for starfive-camss device /dev/v4l-subdev0:
>
> Driver Info:
> Driver version : 6.6.0
> Capabilities : 0x00000000
> Media Driver Info:
> Driver name : starfive-camss
> Model : Starfive Camera Subsystem
> Serial :
> Bus info : platform:19840000.camss
> Media version : 6.6.0
> Hardware revision: 0x00000000 (0)
> Driver version : 6.6.0
> Interface Info:
> ID : 0x0300001c
> Type : V4L Sub-Device
> Entity Info:
> ID : 0x00000001 (1)
> Name : stf_isp
> Function : Image Signal Processor
> Pad 0x01000002 : 0: Sink
> Link 0x02000014: from remote pad 0x1000010 of entity 'cdns_csi2rx.19800000.csi-bridge' (Video Interface Bridge): Data, Enabled
> Pad 0x01000003 : 1: Source
> Link 0x0200000c: to remote pad 0x1000009 of entity 'capture_yuv' (V4L2 I/O): Data, Enabled
Here it shows the Media Driver Info for v4l-subdev0.
<snip>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Compliance test for device /dev/v4l-subdev1:
>
> Driver Info:
> Driver version : 6.6.0
> Capabilities : 0x00000000
But this does not appear for v4l-subdev1.
I can't really tell why it doesn't show that. Can you debug a little bit?
The code is in v4l2-compliance.cpp, line 1086:
ent_id = mi_media_info_for_fd(media_fd, node.g_fd(), &is_invalid, &node.function);
The mi_media_info_for_fd() function calls ioctl(media_fd, MEDIA_IOC_DEVICE_INFO, &mdinfo),
and that fails for some reason. It could be that media_fd is invalid (would be weird).
This could well be a v4l2-compliance bug that you hit with this driver.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists