[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b4739328-5dba-a3a6-54ef-2db2d34201d8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:35:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...hat.com>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based
on the associated PMU
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> u64 kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> + u64 pmcr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) &
> + ~(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> +
> + return pmcr | ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index ff0f7095eaca..c750722fbe4a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -745,12 +745,8 @@ static u64 reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> u64 pmcr;
>
> - /* No PMU available, PMCR_EL0 may UNDEF... */
> - if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> - return 0;
> -
> /* Only preserve PMCR_EL0.N, and reset the rest to 0 */
> - pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) & (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> + pmcr = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
pmcr = ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
Would that maybe make it more clear what is done here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists