[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1976018d-7173-49b3-9285-38cfa570d573@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:14:07 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com,
ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com,
bp@...en8.de, vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com,
jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com, nikunj.dadhania@....com,
pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
zhi.a.wang@...el.com, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/50] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code
On 10/16/23 06:27, Michael Roth wrote:
> Bit 31 in the page fault-error bit will be set when processor encounters
> an RMP violation. While at it, use the BIT() macro.
Any idea where the BIT() use went? I remember seeing it in earlier
versions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists