[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <iplnlgb5mxrltogppm2buz63unviqrziwf7liob6mht6yl776l@3j2dzm7nbs3i>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:18:23 -0500
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
CC: <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
<linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kmod v5 0/5] kmod /usr support
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>it has been a few months since these kmod patches have been posted, and
>a new kmod versio has been released since.
>
>Is there any interest in adding this to kmod?
yes, but I think the main drag is deciding with the kernel build system
maintainers what they are willing to accept as an interface. There isn't
much point in exporting a json config if from the kernel side they would
rather use something else. Or to use pkg-config.
I confess I lost track of that discussion. Did that settle with
pkg-config being the preferred solution?
Lucas De Marchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists