linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH kmod v5 0/5] kmod /usr support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:18:23 -0500
From:   Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To:     Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
CC:     <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>,
        Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kmod v5 0/5] kmod /usr support

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 05:45:39PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>Hello,
>
>it has been a few months since these kmod patches have been posted, and
>a new kmod versio has been released since.
>
>Is there any interest in adding this to kmod?

yes, but I think the main drag is deciding with the kernel build system
maintainers what they are willing to accept as an interface. There isn't
much point in exporting a json config if from the kernel side they would
rather use something else. Or to use pkg-config.

I confess I lost track of that discussion. Did that settle with
pkg-config being the preferred solution?

Lucas De Marchi