linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/benchmark: fix seccom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <169756146776.2941832.18031040054074292190.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 09:51:10 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/benchmark: fix seccom_unotify benchmark for 32-bit

On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:30:19 +0200, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
> Commit 7d5cb68af638 (perf/benchmark: add a new benchmark for
> seccom_unotify) added a reference to __NR_seccomp into perf. This is
> fine as it added also a definition of __NR_seccomp for 64-bit. But it
> failed to do so for 32-bit as instead of ifndef, ifdef was used.
> 
> Fix this typo (so fix the build of perf on 32-bit).
> 
> [...]

Applied to for-linus/seccomp, thanks!

[1/1] perf/benchmark: fix seccom_unotify benchmark for 32-bit
      https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/65159865e69e

Take care,

-- 
Kees Cook