[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyq12y3dy3G2mhwTq2NDozpCJ6MCe4jzH66M7PysPNmhZGLQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 15:00:01 -0400
From: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pid: Allow frozen userspace to reboot from non-init pid ns
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 5:48 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 7:45 PM Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > When the system has a frozen userspace, for example, during hibernation
> > the child reaper task will also be frozen. Attmepting to deliver a
> > signal to it to handle the reboot(2) will ultimately lead to the system
> > hanging unless userspace is thawed.
> >
> > This change checks if the current task is the suspending task and if so
> > it will allow it to proceed with a reboot from the non-init pid ns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>
> > Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
>
> If the report is public, which I think is the case, having a Link: tag
> pointing to it here would be nice.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/pid_namespace.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/pid_namespace.c b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> > index 0bf44afe04dd..4a93a5063eda 100644
> > --- a/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/pid_namespace.c
> > @@ -321,6 +321,15 @@ int reboot_pid_ns(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int cmd)
> > if (pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)
> > return 0;
> >
> > + if (current->flags & PF_SUSPEND_TASK) {
> > + /*
> > + * Attempting to signal the child_reaper won't work if it's
> > + * frozen. In this case we shutdown the system as if we were in
> > + * the init_pid_ns.
> > + */
>
> Is the system guaranteed to be in the right state for a shutdown at this point?
>
> There is a system-wide suspend-resume or hibernation in progress, so
> system_transition_mutex should be held and that should cause reboot()
> to block anyway. Do you know why it doesn't block and why the suspend
> task has any reason to call it?
>
Sorry for the delay in responding to these questions, I'm going to do
another pass through this code and respond with a more detailed
explanation in the next few days.
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART2:
> > case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_RESTART:
> > --
> > 2.42.0.582.g8ccd20d70d-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists