[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <hl3elk273qrxqfajgn6izxwx2kkjq3osrbbtf77pvwcxvqy225@ryev3txohsm7>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 21:13:22 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Bo" <zhanb@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
"yangjie@...rosoft.com" <yangjie@...rosoft.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"anakrish@...rosoft.com" <anakrish@...rosoft.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kristen@...ux.intel.com" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC OOM path to forcefully reclaim
EPC
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:54:48PM +0200, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> wrote:
> Is this distinction between preemptability of EPC pages mandated by the
> HW implementation? (host/"process" enclaves vs VM enclaves) Or do have
> users an option to lock certain pages in memory that yields this
> difference?
(After skimming Documentation/arch/x86/sgx.rst, Section "Virtual EPC")
Or would these two types warrant also two types of miscresource? (To
deal with each in own way.)
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists