[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231017194228.GD2211@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 21:42:28 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: syzbot <syzbot+6aa88a2d31fbec170f8b@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [btrfs?] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low! (3)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:53:45AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: c295ba49917a Merge branch 'for-next/core' into for-kernelci
> git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=135804fe680000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f27cd6e68911e026
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6aa88a2d31fbec170f8b
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> userspace arch: arm64
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=17d48d09680000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=13498275680000
>
> Downloadable assets:
> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/045554f2bee6/disk-c295ba49.raw.xz
> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ba2705f8a872/vmlinux-c295ba49.xz
> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/e36242e95b79/Image-c295ba49.gz.xz
> mounted in repro #1: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/39a4eecc45c3/mount_0.gz
> mounted in repro #2: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3a9106a526c9/mount_1.gz
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+6aa88a2d31fbec170f8b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!
#syz invalid
This is a frequent warning, can be worked around by increasing
CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CHAINS_BITS in config (18 could be a good value but may
still not be enough).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists