[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169757198792.167943.16079905055591841742.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:55:30 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RESEND 0/2] perf cs-etm: Improve timestamp tracing
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 15:41:57 +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> This patch series is to improve timestamp handling in per-thread mode.
>
> The current code doesn't validate timestamp and always return success for
> per-thread mode, for a sane implementation, the first patch is to allow
> validation timestamp tracing in per-thread mode.
>
> The second patch is to respect timestamp option "--timestamp" or "-T",
> when users set this option, the tool will automatically enable hardware
> timestamp tracing in Arm CoreSight.
>
> [...]
Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists