linux-kernel - [patch V5 26/39] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231017211723.409940426@linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:23:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [patch V5 26/39] x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep()

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

This function has nothing to do with suspend. It's a hotplug
callback. Remove the bogus comment.

Drop the pointless debug printk. The hotplug core provides tracepoints
which track the invocation of those callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c |    8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -498,16 +498,10 @@ static int mc_cpu_online(unsigned int cp
 
 static int mc_cpu_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct device *dev;
-
-	dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+	struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 
 	microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
-
-	/* Suspend is in progress, only remove the interface */
 	sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
-	pr_debug("%s: CPU%d\n", __func__, cpu);
-
 	return 0;
 }