[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231017005036.334067-1-gshan@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 10:50:36 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Remove system_uses_lse_atomics()
There are two variants of system_uses_lse_atomics(), depending on
CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS. The function isn't called anywhere when
CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS is disabled. It can be directly replaced
by alternative_has_cap_likely(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS) when the kernel
option is enabled.
No need to keep system_uses_lse_atomics() and just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h
index cbbcdc35c4cd..3129a5819d0e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/lse.h
@@ -16,14 +16,9 @@
#include <asm/atomic_lse.h>
#include <asm/cpucaps.h>
-static __always_inline bool system_uses_lse_atomics(void)
-{
- return alternative_has_cap_likely(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS);
-}
-
#define __lse_ll_sc_body(op, ...) \
({ \
- system_uses_lse_atomics() ? \
+ alternative_has_cap_likely(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS) ? \
__lse_##op(__VA_ARGS__) : \
__ll_sc_##op(__VA_ARGS__); \
})
@@ -34,8 +29,6 @@ static __always_inline bool system_uses_lse_atomics(void)
#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS */
-static inline bool system_uses_lse_atomics(void) { return false; }
-
#define __lse_ll_sc_body(op, ...) __ll_sc_##op(__VA_ARGS__)
#define ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN(llsc, lse) llsc
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists