[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231017092732.19983-8-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:27:24 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...cinc.com,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 07/15] firmware: qcom: scm: make qcom_scm_assign_mem() use the TZ allocator
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Let's use the new TZ memory allocator to obtain a buffer for this call
instead of using dma_alloc_coherent().
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com> # sc8280xp-lenovo-thinkpad-x13s
---
drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
index 71e98b666391..754f6056b99f 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
@@ -998,14 +999,13 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
struct qcom_scm_mem_map_info *mem_to_map;
phys_addr_t mem_to_map_phys;
phys_addr_t dest_phys;
- dma_addr_t ptr_phys;
+ phys_addr_t ptr_phys;
size_t mem_to_map_sz;
size_t dest_sz;
size_t src_sz;
size_t ptr_sz;
int next_vm;
__le32 *src;
- void *ptr;
int ret, i, b;
u64 srcvm_bits = *srcvm;
@@ -1015,10 +1015,13 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
ptr_sz = ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) +
ALIGN(dest_sz, SZ_64);
- ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+ void *ptr __free(qcom_tzmem) = qcom_tzmem_alloc(__scm->mempool,
+ ptr_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ptr_phys = qcom_tzmem_to_phys(ptr);
+
/* Fill source vmid detail */
src = ptr;
i = 0;
@@ -1047,7 +1050,6 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
ret = __qcom_scm_assign_mem(__scm->dev, mem_to_map_phys, mem_to_map_sz,
ptr_phys, src_sz, dest_phys, dest_sz);
- dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, ptr, ptr_phys);
if (ret) {
dev_err(__scm->dev,
"Assign memory protection call failed %d\n", ret);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists