linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the samsung-krzk tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:42:17 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the samsung-krzk tree

Hello,

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:01:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
> 
>   0da7c05d232d ("soc: samsung: exynos-chipid: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
> 
> This is commit
> 
>   55fa358ca89f ("soc: samsung: exynos-chipid: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
> 
> in the arm-soc tree.

a few more details that I worked out for this situation, so (hopefully)
others don't have to duplicate this effort:

The commit in the samsung-krzk tree was applied by Krzysztof at Sep 28
and sent later (Oct 16) as a patch to Arnd (and others) in reply to a PR
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016072911.27148-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/)
and without further explanation.

My guess is that the patch in question wasn't applied to a topic branch
but to Krzysztof's for-next directly and so was missed to be included in
the PR. Or it was on a topic branch but as the only patch on that and so
it was sent out individually. I'd expect that 0da7c05d232d won't make it
into the mainline.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)