[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231017160729.58984467@xps-13>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:07:29 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, conor.culhane@...vaco.com,
joe@...ches.com, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i3c: svc: rename read_len as actual_len
Hi Frank,
Frank.Li@....com wrote on Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:46:30 -0400:
> I3C transfer, target can early terminate transfer.
> I2C transfer, target can NACK write transfer.
>
> 'actual_len' is better name than 'read_len'.
I don't find read_len confusing because it may mean "how much bytes
were actually read" rather than "how much we need to read". But if
actual_len sounds better, I'm fine.
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists