linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fixing indentation and adding License Identifier tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db7e32f5-440d-4e42-8a10-eab0f9d488c8@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 20:06:40 +0530
From:   Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@...il.com>
To:     kherbst@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com, dakr@...hat.com,
        maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
        tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fixing indentation and adding License
 Identifier tag


On 08/10/23 22:57, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> On running checkpatch.pl to nouveau_drm.h identified
> few warnings. Fixing them in this patch
>
> WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1
> +/*
>
> WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE +
> DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>
> Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@...il.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> index 8d7402c13e56..900ca4f1ebe5 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
>   /*
>    * Copyright 2005 Stephane Marchesin.
>    * All Rights Reserved.
> @@ -448,15 +449,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>   
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC      DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>   
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
>   
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF        DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>   
>   #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)

A Gentle remainder. Can someone please help in reviewing these changes ?

Thanks,
Bragathe