[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS9THxlJhHfv4gU9@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 05:38:07 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To: kenechukwu maduechesi <maduechesik@...il.com>
Cc: outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, shreeya.patel23498@...il.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Replace delay function.
Hi Kenechukwu,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 06:03:05PM -0700, kenechukwu maduechesi wrote:
> Replace udelay() with usleep_range() for more precise delay handling.
The reason is not the precise handling, quite the opposite.
> Reported by checkpatch:
>
> CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay
Can you tell why?[*]
> Signed-off-by: kenechukwu maduechesi <maduechesik@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> index 74c4f476b3a4..059f99b0a727 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/sd.c
> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static int sd_change_phase(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u8 sample_point, u8 tune_dir)
> PHASE_CHANGE);
> if (retval)
> return retval;
> - udelay(50);
> + usleep_range(50);
What is the range you will be sleeping, now?
Andi
[*] Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists