linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iomap: fix short copy in iomap_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231018155220.GA26845@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:52:20 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, djwong@...nel.org,
        willy@...radead.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: fix short copy in iomap_write_iter()

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Jan Stancek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:22 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:24:20AM +0200, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > Make next iteration retry with amount of bytes we managed to copy.
> >
> > The observation and logic fix look good.  But I wonder if simply
> > using a goto instead of the extra variable would be a tad cleaner?
> > Something like this?
> 
> Looks good to me. Would you be OK if I re-posted it as v2 with your
> Signed-off-by added?

Please skip my signoff.  This is really your work and I just a very
cosmetic suggestion.