[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <333764e8-fd11-4ed3-b3b4-eeaa14c5cbeb@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:03:03 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@...il.com>
Cc: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao2@...wei.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] SCSI: Fix issues between removing device and error
handle
On 10/18/23 07:40, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:51 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/23 18:37, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>>> The previous version was posted on 2023/9/28 but not reviewed, so I
>>> ping soon after repost.
>>
>> Since a repost counts as a ping, I think posting a ping soon after
>> reposting is considered aggressive.
>
> I didn't mean that, then how long is appropriate to post a ping?
It depends on how busy the reviewers are. I wait at least one week
before sending out a ping or reposting a patch series.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists