lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:04:05 -0700
From:   Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        jgg@...dia.com, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] iommu: Factor out some helpers

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 07:14:48PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The pattern for picking the first device out of the group list is
> repeated a few times now, so it's clearly worth factoring out, which
> also helps hide the iommu_group_dev detail from places that don't need
> to know. Similarly, the safety check for dev_iommu_ops() at certain
> public interfaces starts looking a bit repetitive, and might not be
> completely obvious at first glance, so let's factor that out for clarity
> as well, in preparation for more uses of both.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v3: Rename dev_iommu_ops_valid() to reflect what it's actually checking,
>     rather than an implied consequence.
> v4: Rebase, also catch the sneaky one in iommu_get_group_resv_regions()
>     which wasn't the full pattern (but really should be since it guards
>     the dev_iommu_ops() invocation in iommu_get_resv_regions()).
> ---


Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ