[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS+E91QLqCwrhdTG@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:10:47 +0300
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: typec: fsa4480: Add support to swap SBU
orientation
Hi Luca,
> > Shouldn't you loop through the endpoints? In any case:
> >
> > ep = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev_fwnode(&fsa->client->dev, NULL));
>
> The docs only mention one endpoint so I'm assuming just next_endpoint is
> fine?
I'm mostly concerned about what we may have in the future. If one day
you have more than the one connection in your graph, then you have to
be able to identify the endpoint you are after.
But that may not be a problem in this case (maybe that "data-lanes"
device property can be used to identify the correct endpoint?).
We can worry about it then when/if we ever have another endpoint to
deal with.
thanks,
--
heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists