[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231018082104.3918770-1-link@vivo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:20:58 +0800
From: Huan Yang <link@...o.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Huan Yang <link@...o.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] some fix of multi-gen lru
For multi-gen lru shrink_inactive trace, here are
some mistake:
First, nr_scanned in evict_folios means all folios
which it touched in `get_nr_to_scan`(so not means nr_taken).
So, we may get some info from trace like this:
```
kswapd0-89 [000] 64.887613: mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_inactive:
nid=0 nr_scanned=64 nr_reclaimed=0 nr_dirty=0 nr_writeback=0
nr_congested=0 nr_immediate=0 nr_activate_anon=0 nr_activate_file=0
nr_ref_keep=0 nr_unmap_fail=0 priority=4
flags=RECLAIM_WB_FILE|RECLAIM_WB_ASYNC
```
Actually, we don't taken too much folios in shrink. This patch
use difference between before sc->nr_scanned and after shrink to
replace nr_taken and pass this to shrink_inactive tracing.
Second, also like above info, we can't get nr_folios going to where,
actually in multi-gen lru shrink, many keep by folio_update_gen when
look around or other promote this folio.
Third, evict_folios don't gather reclaim_stat info after shrink list,
so, dirty\writeback\congested stat will miss, and we can't control
LRUVEC_CONGESTED or reclaim_throttle.
Patch 1 aim to resolve first and second, patch 2 resolve third.
Huan Yang (2):
tracing: mm: multigen-lru: fix mglru trace
mm: multi-gen lru: fix stat count
include/linux/vmstat.h | 2 ++
include/trace/events/vmscan.h | 8 ++++-
mm/vmscan.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists