[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6fb88a6a-dd66-4368-8da9-596f384fe5bc@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:02:00 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Saeed Mahameed" <saeed@...nel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Leon Romanovsky" <leonro@...dia.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>, "Jiri Pirko" <jiri@...dia.com>,
"Saeed Mahameed" <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] misc: mlx5ctl: Add info ioctl
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, at 10:19, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Implement INFO ioctl to return the allocated UID and the capability flags
> and some other useful device information such as the underlying ConnectX
> device.
I'm commenting on the ABI here, ignoring everything for the moment.
> static const struct file_operations mlx5ctl_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .open = mlx5ctl_open,
> .release = mlx5ctl_release,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = mlx5ctl_ioctl,
> };
There should be a .compat_ioctl entry as well, to allow 32-bit
tasks to use the same interface.
> static int mlx5ctl_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/mlx5ctl.h b/include/uapi/misc/mlx5ctl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..81d89cd285fc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/misc/mlx5ctl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR Linux-OpenIB WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2023, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. */
> +
> +#ifndef __MLX5CTL_IOCTL_H__
> +#define __MLX5CTL_IOCTL_H__
> +
> +struct mlx5ctl_info {
> + __aligned_u64 flags;
> + __u32 size;
> + __u8 devname[64]; /* underlaying ConnectX device */
> + __u16 uctx_uid; /* current process allocated UCTX UID */
I don't know what a UCTX UID is, but if this is related to
uid_t, it has to be 32 bit wide.
> + __u16 reserved1;
> + __u32 uctx_cap; /* current process effective UCTX cap */
> + __u32 dev_uctx_cap; /* device's UCTX capabilities */
> + __u32 ucap; /* process user capability */
> + __u32 reserved2[4];
> +};
If I'm counting right, this structure has a size of
108 bytes but an alignment of 8 bytes, so you end up with
a 4-byte hole at the end, which introduces a risk of
leaking kernel data. Maybe give it an extra reserved word?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists