linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] MediaTek DRM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85277960-8c6a-485d-8dd4-9c1eb37f5818@collabora.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:24:22 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     chunkuang.hu@...nel.org
Cc:     p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
        Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] MediaTek DRM - DSI driver cleanups

Il 24/05/23 11:34, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> This series performs some cleanups for mtk_dsi, enhancing human
> readability, using kernel provided macros where possible and
> also reducing code size.
> 
> Tested on MT8173 and MT8192 Chromebooks (using a DSI<->DP bridge)
> and on MT6795 Sony Xperia M5 (DSI video mode panel).
> 
> Please note:
> This series depends and can be applied only on top of [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230523104234.7849-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/
> 
> AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (4):
>    drm/mediatek: dsi: Use GENMASK() for register mask definitions
>    drm/mediatek: dsi: Cleanup functions mtk_dsi_ps_control{_vact}()
>    drm/mediatek: dsi: Use bitfield macros where useful
>    drm/mediatek: dsi: Replace open-coded instance of HZ_PER_MHZ
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 198 +++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> 

Hello CK,

this series still applies and it's a nice cleanup.

Is there anything wrong with this? Can you please check it out?

Thanks,
Angelo