[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jJDr0w2R2Up_e_ZSeuw9Z-29FdHheGHwCjh05++GKe=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:23:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: chenguohua@...i.cn
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Clean up errors in acpi.h
First, the subject is misleading, because the patch doesn't address
any errors, but cleans up the usage of white space.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 6:32 AM <chenguohua@...i.cn> wrote:
>
> Fix the following errors reported by checkpatch:
Why does it make sense to run checkpatch on the existing code?
> ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
> ERROR: space required after that ';' (ctx:VxV)
>
> Signed-off-by: GuoHua Cheng <chenguohua@...i.cn>
Please fix the changelog to simply state that it cleans up the usage
of white space so it is consistent with the kernel coding style.
> ---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 9bcf5641a7cf..b55a8ac627e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ acpi_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> }
>
> #define ACPI_DECLARE_PROBE_ENTRY(table, name, table_id, subtable, valid, data, fn) \
> - static const void * __acpi_table_##name[] \
> + static const void *__acpi_table_##name[] \
> __attribute__((unused)) \
> = { (void *) table_id, \
> (void *) subtable, \
> @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ acpi_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> (void *) fn, \
> (void *) data }
>
> -#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r;})
> +#define acpi_probe_device_table(t) ({ int __r = 0; __r; })
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE
> --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists