[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <688adbc9-6dbc-4c98-971e-630525ff003b@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 12:27:55 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: conor.dooley@...rochip.com, suagrfillet@...il.com,
bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, rafael@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, pierre.gondois@....com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
bristot@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, ajones@...tanamicro.com, lftan@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] consolidate and cleanup CPU capacity
On 10/9/23 11:36, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This is the 1st part of consolidating how the max compute capacity is
> used in the scheduler and how we calculate the frequency for a level of
> utilization.
>
> Fix some unconsistancy when computing frequency for an utilization. There
> can be a mismatch between energy model and schedutil.
>
> Next step will be to make a difference between the original
> max compute capacity of a CPU and what is currently available when
> there is a capping applying forever (i.e. seconds or more).
>
>
I have tested the patches apart from the last CPPC because the platform
didn't have that. The EAS is working OK, so feel free to add:
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
apart from the patch 6/6 - with the cppc changes
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists