lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <652f465489b2b_2bb5d829431@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:43:32 -0700
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
CC:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] firmware/efi: Process CXL Component Events

Ira Weiny wrote:
> Ira Weiny wrote:

[snip]

> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> > index 35c37f667781..af2c59f5e21d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> > @@ -607,6 +607,22 @@ cper_estatus_print_section(const char *pfx, struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata
> >  			cper_print_prot_err(newpfx, prot_err);
> >  		else
> >  			goto err_section_too_small;
> > +	} else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &gen_media_event_guid) ||
> > +		   guid_equal(sec_type, &dram_event_guid) ||
> > +		   guid_equal(sec_type, &mem_mod_event_guid)) {
> > +		struct cper_cxl_event_rec *rec = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
> > +
> 
> Smita,
> 
> Dan and I were discussing the processing of these GUIDs vs the UUIDs in the
> trace prints offline.
> 
> Here we could separate out the comparisons and use a token for the events
> rather than passing the guid through to be converted into a uuid...
> 

Sorry I hit send too soon...  Please see my other post.

Ira

[snip]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ