[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZS/TRNf02Un8IOTK@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:44:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Drop 4MB restriction on minimal NUMA node
memory size
* Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com> wrote:
> > While I agree with dropping the limitation, and I agree that
> > 9391a3f9c7f1 should have provided more of a justification, I believe a
> > core MM fix is in order as well, for it to not crash. [ If it's fixed
> > upstream already, please reference the relevant commit ID. ]
>
> Agree. I posted a fixed patchset[1] before, maybe we can reconsider it.
> :)
>
> [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230215152412.13368-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
>
> For memoryless node, this patchset skip it and fallback to other nodes
> when build its zonelists.
Mind resubmitting that to the MM folks, with the NULL dereference crash
mentioned prominently? Feel free to Cc: me.
Fixing hypothetical robustness problems is good, fixing specific crashes is
better. :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists